[socks] Report errors elegantly when credentails are required but missing
In some non-standard implementations, the server may respond AUTH_USER_PASS even if's not listed in available authentication methods. (it should respond AUTH_NO_ACCEPTABLE per standards)
This commit is contained in:
parent
facfd79f9a
commit
54f54fcca7
@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
|
||||
version <unreleased>
|
||||
|
||||
Core
|
||||
|
||||
* [socks] Handle cases where credentials are required but missing
|
||||
|
||||
Extractors
|
||||
- [azubu] Remove extractor (#12813)
|
||||
* [porn91] Fix extraction (#12814)
|
||||
|
@ -193,9 +193,10 @@ class sockssocket(socket.socket):
|
||||
|
||||
self._check_response_version(SOCKS5_VERSION, version)
|
||||
|
||||
if method == Socks5Auth.AUTH_NO_ACCEPTABLE:
|
||||
if method == Socks5Auth.AUTH_NO_ACCEPTABLE or (
|
||||
method == Socks5Auth.AUTH_USER_PASS and (not self._proxy.username or not self._proxy.password)):
|
||||
self.close()
|
||||
raise Socks5Error(method)
|
||||
raise Socks5Error(Socks5Auth.AUTH_NO_ACCEPTABLE)
|
||||
|
||||
if method == Socks5Auth.AUTH_USER_PASS:
|
||||
username = self._proxy.username.encode('utf-8')
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user